<?xml version='1.0'?>
<!DOCTYPE art SYSTEM 'http://www.biomedcentral.com/xml/article.dtd'>
<art><ui>1743-7075-7-1</ui><ji>1743-7075</ji><fm>
<dochead>Research</dochead>
<bibl>
<title>
<p>A high protein moderate carbohydrate diet fed at discrete meals reduces early progression of N-methyl-N-nitrosourea-induced breast tumorigenesis in rats</p>
</title>
<aug>
<au id="A1"><snm>Moulton</snm><mi>J</mi><fnm>Christopher</fnm><insr iid="I1"/><email>cmoulto2@illinois.edu</email></au>
<au id="A2"><snm>Valentine</snm><mi>J</mi><fnm>Rudy</fnm><insr iid="I2"/><email>rvalenti@illinois.edu</email></au>
<au ca="yes" id="A3"><snm>Layman</snm><mi>K</mi><fnm>Donald</fnm><insr iid="I1"/><insr iid="I3"/><email>dlayman@illinois.edu</email></au>
<au id="A4"><snm>Devkota</snm><fnm>Suzanne</fnm><insr iid="I1"/><email>devkota@uchicago.edu</email></au>
<au id="A5"><snm>Singletary</snm><mi>W</mi><fnm>Keith</fnm><insr iid="I3"/><email>kws@illinois.edu</email></au>
<au id="A6"><snm>Wallig</snm><mi>A</mi><fnm>Matthew</fnm><insr iid="I4"/><email>mawallig@illinois.edu</email></au>
<au id="A7"><snm>Donovan</snm><mi>M</mi><fnm>Sharon</fnm><insr iid="I1"/><insr iid="I3"/><email>sdonovan@illinois.edu</email></au>
</aug>
<insg>
<ins id="I1"><p>Division of Nutritional Sciences, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 905 S Goodwin Ave, Urbana, IL 61801, USA</p></ins>
<ins id="I2"><p>Department of Kinesiology and Community Health, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 117 Louise Freer Hall, 906 S Goodwin Ave, Urbana, IL 61801, USA</p></ins>
<ins id="I3"><p>Department of Food Science and Human Nutrition, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 905 S Goodwin Ave, Urbana, IL 61801, USA</p></ins>
<ins id="I4"><p>Department of Veterinary Pathobiology, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 2522 VMBSB, 2001 S Lincoln Ave, Urbana, IL 61801, USA</p></ins>
</insg>
<source>Nutrition &amp; Metabolism</source>
<issn>1743-7075</issn>
<pubdate>2010</pubdate>
<volume>7</volume>
<issue>1</issue>
<fpage>1</fpage>
<url>http://www.nutritionandmetabolism.com/content/7/1/1</url>
<xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="pmpid">20148110</pubid><pubid idtype="doi">10.1186/1743-7075-7-1</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib>
</bibl>
<history><rec><date><day>6</day><month>11</month><year>2009</year></date></rec><acc><date><day>10</day><month>1</month><year>2010</year></date></acc><pub><date><day>10</day><month>1</month><year>2010</year></date></pub></history>
<cpyrt><year>2010</year><collab>Moulton et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.</collab><note>This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (<url>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0</url>), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.</note></cpyrt>
<abs>
<sec>
<st>
<p>Abstract</p>
</st>
<p>Breast cancer is the most prevalent cancer in American women. Dietary factors are thought to have a strong influence on breast cancer incidence. This study utilized a meal-feeding protocol with female Sprague-Dawley rats to evaluate effects of two ratios of carbohydrate:protein on promotion and early progression of breast tissue carcinomas. Mammary tumors were induced by N-methyl-N-nitrosourea (MNU) at 52 d of age. Post-induction, animals were assigned to consume either a low protein high carbohydrate diet (LPHC; 15% and 60% of energy, respectively) or a high protein moderate carbohydrate diet (HPMC; 35% and 40% of energy, respectively) for 10 wk. Animals were fed 3 meals/day to mimic human absorption and metabolism patterns. The rate of palpable tumor incidence was reduced in HPMC relative to LPHC (12.9 &#177; 1.4%/wk vs. 18.2 &#177; 1.3%/wk). At 3 wk, post-prandial serum insulin was larger in the LPHC relative to HPMC (+136.4 &#177; 33.1 pmol/L vs. +38.1 &#177; 23.4 pmol/L), while at 10 wk there was a trend for post-prandial IGF-I to be increased in HPMC (<it>P </it>= 0.055). There were no differences in tumor latency, tumor surface area, or cumulative tumor mass between diet groups. The present study provides evidence that reducing the dietary carbohydrate:protein ratio attenuates the development of mammary tumors. These findings are consistent with reduced post-prandial insulin release potentially diminishing the proliferative environment required for breast cancer tumors to progress.</p>
</sec>
</abs>
</fm><bdy>
<sec>
<st>
<p>Background</p>
</st>
<p>Breast cancer is the most common cancer in American women, with over 40,000 annual deaths and nearly 200,000 estimated new cases in 2009 <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B1">1</abbr>
</abbrgrp>. Given the high prevalence of breast cancer and associated physical, social, and psychological detriments <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B2">2</abbr>
</abbrgrp>, reducing cancer incidence through modifiable risk factors such as nutrition is a high public health priority. Estimates suggest that cancer incidence could be reduced by ~1/3 through modifications in diet, including changes in total energy intake and diet content of fat, protein or carbohydrate <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B3">3</abbr>
</abbrgrp>. With increased attention on higher protein, low carbohydrate diets for weight management, secondary effects of these diets on tumor development are important to evaluate.</p>
<p>Some studies report that dietary protein, and particularly consumption of animal protein, is linked to increased risk of breast cancer <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B4">4</abbr>
<abbr bid="B5">5</abbr>
</abbrgrp>. However, recent large-scale evaluations have failed to identify intakes of meat, eggs, or dairy products as risk factors <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B6">6</abbr>
</abbrgrp>. Conversely, epidemiological studies have reported protective effects of dietary protein on breast cancer incidence <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B7">7</abbr>
</abbrgrp> and mortality <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B8">8</abbr>
</abbrgrp>. A recent case-controlled study suggests that a dietary pattern including the highest relative levels of animal protein is inversely associated with breast cancer risk <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B9">9</abbr>
</abbrgrp>.</p>
<p>Evidence is now accumulating that dietary carbohydrates, glycemic load, and hyperinsulinemia are associated with increased cancer risk <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B10">10</abbr>
<abbr bid="B11">11</abbr>
</abbrgrp> and mortality <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B12">12</abbr>
</abbrgrp>. Higher levels of circulating and post-prandial insulin have been reported to enhance cellular proliferation and tumor development <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B13">13</abbr>
</abbrgrp> through upregulation of the PI3K/Akt signal pathway which is implicated in breast cancer promotion and tumorigenesis <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B14">14</abbr>
</abbrgrp>. Furthermore, insulin stimulates the ovaries to produce androgens <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B15">15</abbr>
</abbrgrp>, which have been linked to increased breast cancer risk <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B16">16</abbr>
</abbrgrp>. To our knowledge, no studies have attempted to compare the effects of dietary protein versus carbohydrates in an experimental model of breast cancer.</p>
<p>We have previously demonstrated that feeding rats diets with increased protein and reduced carbohydrates enhances muscle insulin signaling and glucose uptake, attenuates post-prandial hyperinsulinemia, and stimulates skeletal muscle protein synthesis <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B17">17</abbr>
<abbr bid="B18">18</abbr>
</abbrgrp>. Our experimental model uses a meal-feeding protocol with three discrete meals each day to mimic human eating patterns and allow for isolation of post-prandial meal responses. This study examined the effects of feeding diets differing in ratios of carbohydrate/protein, but within the Dietary Reference Intake (DRI) acceptable macronutrient distribution range, on tumor incidence, size, and development, in a chemically-induced model of breast cancer. We hypothesized that a diet with a reduced carbohydrate:protein ratio would have a favorable impact on breast cancer development by tempering post-prandial insulin response.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<st>
<p>Methods</p>
</st>
<sec>
<st>
<p>Experimental Model</p>
</st>
<p>Female 45 d old Sprague-Dawley rats (n = 74; Harlan-Teklad, Indianapolis, IN) with a mean body weight of 135 &#177; 4.8 g were housed individually in stainless steel wire-bottomed cages and maintained at 24&#176;C with 12 h reverse light cycle (light: 1900-0700 h) and free access to water. Rats were trained to consume three meals each day using a modified AIN-93G diet <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B19">19</abbr>
</abbrgrp> (60% of energy from carbohydrate, 15% protein, and 25% fat; LPHC) as the baseline control. The meal pattern consisted of a 3 g breakfast meal (20% of total energy) consumed between 0700-0720 h, followed by free access to food between 1300-1400 h (~40% total energy) and 1800-1900 h (~40% total energy). At 52 d of age, animals were randomly assigned to consume either the baseline low protein high carbohydrate diet (LPHC; n = 37) or a high protein moderate carbohydrate diet (40% carbohydrate, 35% protein, and 25% fat; HPMC; n = 37) (Table <tblr tid="T1">1</tblr>). Both diet treatments were isoenergetic. Tumors were induced in all animals at 52 d of age by a single intraperitoneal dose of N-methyl-N-nitrosourea (MNU) at 50 mg/kg body weight in 1 ml of 0.9% NaCl <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B20">20</abbr>
</abbrgrp>. Rats were weighed and food intake measured each week. The animal protocol was approved by the University of Illinois Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee.</p>
<tbl id="T1"><title><p>Table 1</p></title><caption><p>Diet Composition for Treatment Groups</p></caption><tblbdy cols="3">
      <r>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>
               <b>Diet Component</b>
            </p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>
               <b>LPHC</b>
            </p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>
               <b>HPMC</b>
            </p>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c cspan="3">
            <hr/>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>Corn Starch</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>396.69</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>264.46</p>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>Sucrose</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>99.96</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>66.64</p>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>Maltodextrin</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>132.02</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>88.01</p>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>Casein</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>154.85</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>361.27</p>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>Soybean Oil</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>116.24</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>116.24</p>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>t-Butylhydroquinone</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.014</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.014</p>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>Choline</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>2.5</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>2.5</p>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>AIN93G Minerals</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>35</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>35</p>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>AIN93G Vitamins</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>10</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>10</p>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>Cellulose</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>50</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>50</p>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>Cystine</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>2.36</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>2.36</p>
         </c>
      </r>
   </tblbdy><tblfn>
      <p>Grams per kg diet. LPHC and HPMC represent low protein and high protein diet groups, respectively.</p>
   </tblfn></tbl>
</sec>
<sec>
<st>
<p>Measurements</p>
</st>
<p>At 3 wk post-MNU treatment, rats were randomly selected from LPHC (n = 12) and HPMC (n = 12) groups and evaluated for metabolic changes associated with diet treatments prior to tumor appearance. Rats were euthanized either after overnight food deprivation (fasted) or 90 min following consumption of a 3 g breakfast meal. Trunk blood was collected in K<sub>3</sub>EDTA vacutainers (BD, Franklin Lakes, NJ), placed on ice, and subsequently centrifuged at 1500 &#215; G at 4&#176;C for 20 min. Plasma was decanted and stored at -80&#176;C for further analysis. Soleus and gastrocnemius muscles of the left leg were rapidly excised and frozen in liquid nitrogen, while the soleus and gastrocnemius of the right leg were dissected and weighed. Likewise, the left retroperitoneal fat pad was excised and frozen and the right retroperitoneal fat pad dissected and weighed. Liver was excised, weighed, and frozen. The 3 wk time point was intended to capture metabolic differences that could affect tumor promotion, while avoiding confounding pathology associated with tumor development.</p>
<p>At 10 wk post-induction, rats from LPHC (n = 12) and HPMC (n = 12) were measured for body fat using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometery (DXA) (Hologic, Inc., Bedford, MA). To isolate diet effects on body composition, only rats without palpable tumors were scanned. Rats were sedated with medetomidine hydrochloride (Orion, Espoo, Finland) at 0.3 mg/kg body weight 10 min prior to scanning, and were revived with atipamezole (Orion, Espoo, Finland) at 0.15 mg/kg body weight following the scan. All rats (LPHC: n = 25; HPMC: n = 25) were euthanized in a similar manner 3-4 d after DXA scanning and blood, soleus and gastrocnemius muscles, adipose, and liver were collected and weighed as previously described. Mammary tumors were rapidly excised, weighed, rinsed in saline, and a portion was fixed for 24 hr in 10% neutral buffered formalin for histological analysis. Fixed tumors were stored in 75% ethanol, then subsequently dehydrated and imbedded in paraffin. Imbedded tumors were then sectioned at 2-4 &#956;M and stained with hematoxylin and eosin. Tumor sections were graded histologically on the following semi-quantitative scale: 0 - low grade adenocarcinoma, 1 - high grade adenocarcinoma, 2 - mild mammary hyperplasia, 3 - marked mammary hyperplasia.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<st>
<p>Carcinogenesis Parameters</p>
</st>
<p>Animals were monitored for mammary tumor appearance beginning at 5 wk post-induction through the remainder of the study and after animal euthanasia. Rats were palpated for mammary tumors 2 times/wk. When a tumor was detected, the date and tumor location were recorded. Tumor incidence and latency to tumor appearance were determined qualitatively by palpation. Tumor dimensions of length and width were measured orthogonally by caliper. Tumor surface area was calculated by the following formula: 4&#960; &#215; (length/2) &#215; (width/2). Following euthanasia, all tumors were excised and weighed.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<st>
<p>Metabolic Analyses</p>
</st>
<p>Plasma glucose was measured by glucose oxidase assay (Thermo, Waltham, MA). Plasma insulin was measured by commercial RIA kit (Millipore, Billerica, MA). Plasma IGF-I was measured by RIA after dissociation from IGFBP by Sephadex G-50 chromatography in 0.2 M formic acid. Eluant containing the free IGF was collected and lyophilized (Labconco Freeze Dry Systems, Kansas City, MO). IGF-I concentrations were measured using [<sup>125</sup>I]-IGF-I as a competitive radioligand and a polyclonal anti-human antibody (National Hormone and Pituitary Program, NIDDK, Torrance, CA). Bound radioactivity was measured using a gamma counter (Packard Instruments, Meriden, CT) and concentrations were determined relative to a standard curve prepared with recombinant human IGF-I <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B21">21</abbr>
</abbrgrp>.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<st>
<p>Statistical Analysis</p>
</st>
<p>Data are expressed as mean &#177; SEM. Plasma glucose, insulin, and IGF-I were analyzed using 2-way ANOVA and between-diet differences were evaluated at each time point. Tumor incidence and time of appearance were evaluated using linear regression analysis. Histological classification of excised tumors was analyzed with a Mann-Whitney U test. All other carcinogenesis parameters, as well as body weight and food intake were analyzed by a Student's <it>t</it>-test. The level of significance was set at <it>P </it>&lt; 0.05. All analyses were performed using SPSS Version 15.0 (Chicago, IL).</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec>
<st>
<p>Results</p>
</st>
<sec>
<st>
<p>Animal Weight Gain, Food Intake, and Body Composition</p>
</st>
<p>Body weights of HPMC and LPHC groups were not different at baseline (Figure <figr fid="F1">1</figr>). At 3 wk, there were no differences between groups in body weight or weights of gastrocnemius, soleus, or retroperitoneal fat pad (Table <tblr tid="T2">2</tblr>). Body weight was greater in the HPMC group at wks 3, 5-7, and 9-10 (<it>P </it>&lt; 0.05) (Figure <figr fid="F1">1</figr>). There were no differences in food intake between groups at any time during the study. At 10 wk, there were no differences in gastrocnemius or soleus weights between diet groups (Table <tblr tid="T2">2</tblr>) or in % body fat measured by DXA. However, retroperitoneal fat and liver were heavier in the HPMC group.</p>
<fig id="F1"><title><p>Figure 1</p></title><caption><p>Body Weights; Values represent Means &#177; SEM</p></caption><text>
   <p><b>Body Weights; Values represent Means &#177; SEM</b>. * indicates significant difference (P &gt; 0.05).</p>
</text><graphic file="1743-7075-7-1-1"/></fig>
<tbl id="T2"><title><p>Table 2</p></title><caption><p>Body Composition Measures</p></caption><tblbdy cols="5">
      <r>
         <c>
            <p/>
         </c>
         <c>
            <p/>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>
               <b>LPHC</b>
            </p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>
               <b>HPMC</b>
            </p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>
               <b><it>P </it>value</b>
            </p>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c cspan="5">
            <hr/>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>Gastrocnemius weight (g)</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>3 wk</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>1.32 &#177; 0.03</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>1.32 &#177; 0.05</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.939</p>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c>
            <p/>
         </c>
         <c cspan="4">
            <hr/>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c>
            <p/>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>10 wk</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>1.54 &#177; 0.02</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>1.57 &#177; 0.03</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.398</p>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c cspan="5">
            <hr/>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>Soleus weight (g)</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>3 wk</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.245 &#177; 0.006</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.237 &#177; 0.009</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.472</p>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c>
            <p/>
         </c>
         <c cspan="4">
            <hr/>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c>
            <p/>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>10 wk</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.299 &#177; 0.007</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.309 &#177; 0.006</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.281</p>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c cspan="5">
            <hr/>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>Adipose weight (g)</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>3 wk</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.374 &#177; 0.056</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.358 &#177; 0.055</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.844</p>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c>
            <p/>
         </c>
         <c cspan="4">
            <hr/>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c>
            <p/>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>10 wk</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.443 &#177; 0.037</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.585 &#177; 0.047</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.021</p>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c cspan="5">
            <hr/>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>Liver weight (g)</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>3 wk</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>-</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>-</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>-</p>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c>
            <p/>
         </c>
         <c cspan="4">
            <hr/>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c>
            <p/>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>10 wk</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>5.60 &#177; 0.13</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>6.04 &#177; 0.11</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.012</p>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c cspan="5">
            <hr/>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>% Body fat</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>10 wk</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>10.8 &#177; 0.6</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>11.2 &#177; 0.7</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.588</p>
         </c>
      </r>
   </tblbdy><tblfn>
      <p>Values represent Mean &#177; SEM, n = 6 for each fasted and fed group.</p>
   </tblfn></tbl>
</sec>
<sec>
<st>
<p>Serum Glucose, Insulin, &amp; IGF-I Concentrations</p>
</st>
<p>Serum glucose was not different between groups at 3 or 10 wk (Table <tblr tid="T3">3</tblr>) in either fasted or post-prandial blood samples. At 3 wk, fasting insulin tended to be higher in the HPMC group (<it>P </it>= 0.09), while the meal response of serum insulin was greater in the LPHC group compared to HPMC group (+136.4 &#177; 33.1 pmol/L vs. +38.1 &#177; 23.4 pmol/L, respectively; <it>P </it>= 0.035). At 10 wk, post-prandial serum insulin was elevated in both LPHC and HPMC groups compared to fasted animals. Serum IGF-I was not significantly modified by diet or meal-feeding at 3 wk. At 10 wk there was a trend for serum IGF-I to be increased post-prandially in the HPMC group (<it>P </it>= 0.055).</p>
<tbl id="T3"><title><p>Table 3</p></title><caption><p>Plasma Metabolic Measurements</p></caption><tblbdy cols="7">
      <r>
         <c>
            <p/>
         </c>
         <c>
            <p/>
         </c>
         <c>
            <p/>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>
               <b>Fasted</b>
            </p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>
               <b>Fed</b>
            </p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>
               <b>Time Effect</b>
            </p>
            <p>
               <b><it>P </it>Value</b>
            </p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>
               <b>Time &#215; Diet Effect</b>
            </p>
            <p>
               <b><it>P </it>Value</b>
            </p>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c cspan="7">
            <hr/>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>Glucose (mmol/L)</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>3 wk</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>LPHC</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>6.86 &#177; 0.50</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>6.74 &#177; 0.44</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.854</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.841</p>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c>
            <p/>
         </c>
         <c>
            <p/>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>HPMC</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>7.16 &#177; 0.48</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>6.84 &#177; 0.47</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.642</p>
         </c>
         <c>
            <p/>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c>
            <p/>
         </c>
         <c cspan="6">
            <hr/>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c>
            <p/>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>10 wk</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>LPHC</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>6.73 &#177; 0.18</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>6.54 &#177; 0.27</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.565</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.656</p>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c>
            <p/>
         </c>
         <c>
            <p/>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>HPMC</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>6.70 &#177; 0.27</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>6.74 &#177; 0.31</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.917</p>
         </c>
         <c>
            <p/>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c cspan="7">
            <hr/>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>Insulin (pmol/L)</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>3 wk</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>LPHC</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>77.4 &#177; 11.6</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>213.8 &#177; 33.1</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.003</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.075</p>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c>
            <p/>
         </c>
         <c>
            <p/>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>HPMC</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>125.1 &#177; 19.8</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>163.2 &#177; 23.4</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.350</p>
         </c>
         <c>
            <p/>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c>
            <p/>
         </c>
         <c cspan="6">
            <hr/>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c>
            <p/>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>10 wk</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>LPHC</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>86.2 &#177; 10.4</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>194.4 &#177; 29.7</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.002</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.520</p>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c>
            <p/>
         </c>
         <c>
            <p/>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>HPMC</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>77.5 &#177; 5.8</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>220.2 &#177; 37.6</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.003</p>
         </c>
         <c>
            <p/>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c cspan="7">
            <hr/>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>IGF-I (&#956;g/L)</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>3 wk</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>LPHC</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>240 &#177; 24</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>272 &#177; 26</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.396</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.564</p>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c>
            <p/>
         </c>
         <c>
            <p/>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>HPMC</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>274 &#177; 10</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>268 &#177; 32</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.917</p>
         </c>
         <c>
            <p/>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c>
            <p/>
         </c>
         <c cspan="6">
            <hr/>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c>
            <p/>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>10 wk</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>LPHC</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>205 &#177; 30</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>211 &#177; 17</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.851</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.221</p>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c>
            <p/>
         </c>
         <c>
            <p/>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>HPMC</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>237 &#177; 17</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>299 &#177; 23</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.055</p>
         </c>
         <c>
            <p/>
         </c>
      </r>
   </tblbdy><tblfn>
      <p>Values represent Mean &#177; SEM, n = 6 for each fasted and fed group</p>
   </tblfn></tbl>
</sec>
<sec>
<st>
<p>Carcinogenesis Parameters</p>
</st>
<p>At 3 wk post-induction, no animals had palpable tumors and no tumors were found during dissection. Initial palpable tumors were detected at 51 d in the LPHC group and 55 d in the HPMC group. Surface area of palpable tumors was not different between treatments at any time point. The rate of tumor incidence was higher in the LPHC group with relative slopes of tumor incidence of 18.2 &#177; 1.3%/wk and 12.9 &#177; 1.4%/wk (<it>P </it>&lt; 0.05) for the LPHC and HPMC groups, respectively (Figure <figr fid="F2">2</figr>). Other characteristics of tumor incidence, tumor latency (average time to first tumor development), and cumulative tumor mass at 10 wk, were not different between treatments (Table <tblr tid="T4">4</tblr>). All excised tumors were confirmed histologically to be mammary ductal carcinomas, and there were no differences between groups in the grade of the carcinomas.</p>
<fig id="F2"><title><p>Figure 2</p></title><caption><p>Tumor Incidence; Comparison of slopes of linear regression (P = 0.019); LPHC: y = 18.10x - 119.3, r<sup>2 </sup>= 0.968; HPMC: y = 12.95x - 87.86, r<sup>2 </sup>= 0.937</p></caption><text>
   <p><b>Tumor Incidence; Comparison of slopes of linear regression (P = 0.019); LPHC: y = 18.10x - 119.3, r<sup>2 </sup>= 0.968; HPMC: y = 12.95x - 87.86, r<sup>2 </sup>= 0.937</b>.</p>
</text><graphic file="1743-7075-7-1-2"/></fig>
<tbl id="T4"><title><p>Table 4</p></title><caption><p>Carcinogenesis Parameters</p></caption><tblbdy cols="4">
      <r>
         <c>
            <p/>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>
               <b>LPHC</b>
            </p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>
               <b>HPMC</b>
            </p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>
               <b><it>P </it>value</b>
            </p>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c cspan="4">
            <hr/>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>Tumor Incidence at 10 wk</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.56</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.4</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>&gt; 0.05</p>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>Tumor Latency (wk)</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>8.36 &#177; 0.21</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>8.60 &#177; 0.26</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>&gt; 0.05</p>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>Cumulative Tumor Mass (g)</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>2.22 &#177; 0.67</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>2.51 &#177; 1.40</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>&gt; 0.05</p>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>Rate of Tumor Incidence (% per wk)</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>18.2 &#177; 1.3</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>12.9 &#177; 1.4</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.019</p>
         </c>
      </r>
   </tblbdy><tblfn>
      <p>Values represent Means &#177; SEM.</p>
   </tblfn></tbl>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec>
<st>
<p>Discussion</p>
</st>
<p>The objective of this study was to identify potential effects of manipulating the dietary carbohydrate:protein ratio on the promotion of MNU-induced breast cancer tumors. A major finding of our study is that a HPMC diet with an reduced carbohydrate:protein ratio significantly reduced the rate of incidence of palpable mammary tumors. Although tumor latency was not different between groups, once palpable tumors began to appear, the rate of tumor appearance proceeded more rapidly in the LPHC group. This suggests that either reduced dietary carbohydrate or elevated dietary protein (or both), can attenuate the early development of mammary tumors. In agreement with our previous study <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B17">17</abbr>
</abbrgrp>, post-prandial insulin at 3 wk was elevated in the LPHC group and not in the HPMC group. Thus, animals in the LPHC group were likely exposed to higher, repeated elevations in serum insulin following each discrete meal during the period leading to the emergence of palpable mammary tumors. Post-prandial insulin at 10 wk was elevated in both groups, although host metabolism was likely confounded by tumor pathology, and this change does not necessarily diminish the early effect of post-prandial insulin on tumor promotion.</p>
<p>Nearly two decades ago, hyperinsulinemia was identified as a significant risk factor for breast cancer, independent of body composition or adiposity <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B22">22</abbr>
</abbrgrp>. Cohort studies have found that women surgically treated for breast cancer with high fasted insulin levels had substantially increased risk for reoccurrence and death <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B23">23</abbr>
</abbrgrp> and that the highest tertile of fasted insulin levels was associated with a 2-fold increase in post-menopausal breast cancer risk <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B24">24</abbr>
<abbr bid="B25">25</abbr>
</abbrgrp>. Most recently, the presence of metabolic syndrome was reported to be associated with breast cancer risk <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B26">26</abbr>
</abbrgrp>, and insulin resistance and post-prandial hyperinsulinemia are central features of metabolic syndrome <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B27">27</abbr>
</abbrgrp>, leading to suggestions that metabolic syndrome may serve as a prognostic factor for breast cancer <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B28">28</abbr>
</abbrgrp>. With respect to dietary factors, a positive association between high glycemic index/load and breast cancer risk has been identified <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B29">29</abbr>
<abbr bid="B30">30</abbr>
</abbrgrp>. High total carbohydrate intake <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B31">31</abbr>
</abbrgrp> and sucrose intake have been associated with unfavorable outcomes for breast cancer.</p>
<p>One of the mechanisms by which insulin has been proposed to increase breast cancer risk is via IGF-I. Elevated insulin can increase serum free IGF-I concentrations <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B32">32</abbr>
</abbrgrp>. Overexpression of IGF-I in mammary epithelium <it>in vivo </it>leads to hyperplasia, spontaneous tumorogenesis, and enhanced susceptibility to chemical carcinogens <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B33">33</abbr>
</abbrgrp>, and circulating IGF-I appears to be important for the onset and subsequent development of mammary tumorigenesis in <it>in vivo </it>experiments <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B34">34</abbr>
<abbr bid="B35">35</abbr>
</abbrgrp>. In the present study, the elevated post-prandial insulin observed in the LPHC group was not associated with increased serum IGF-I concentrations.</p>
<p>Clinically, the effect of IGF-I on breast cancer remains equivocal. Elevated serum IGF-I concentrations appear to increase risk of pre-, but not post-menopausal breast cancer, while higher blood glucose levels were associated with increased risk for developing post-menopausal breast cancer <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B36">36</abbr>
</abbrgrp>. However, a case control study identified a weak association for IGF-I with breast cancer in women under the age of fifty <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B37">37</abbr>
</abbrgrp>. Most recently, the Women's Health Initiative study found a strong association between fasting insulin levels and breast cancer in post-menopausal women, but no association of free IGF-I <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B38">38</abbr>
</abbrgrp>.</p>
<p>IGF-I bioactivity is modulated by IGF binding proteins (IGFBP), which can block IGF-I from binding to its receptor. At least 75% of circulating IGF-I is bound to IGFBP-3 <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B39">39</abbr>
</abbrgrp>, though IGFBP-3 levels remain fairly constant within individuals <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B40">40</abbr>
</abbrgrp>. IGFBP-1 and IGFBP-2 levels are inversely associated with insulin levels <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B41">41</abbr>
</abbrgrp>, which suggests that chronic hyperinsulinemia could depress binding protein interaction and thus increase free IGF-I. Serum IGF-I levels have also been shown to relate to protein intake <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B42">42</abbr>
</abbrgrp>. In the present study at 10 wk, there was a trend for post-prandial IGF-I to be higher (p = 0.055) in the HPMC group. Despite the elevation of IGF-I in the HPMC group, the rate of tumor incidence was significantly lower.</p>
<p>Consistent with our findings, early animal experiments investigating the influence of dietary protein on breast cancer found that feeding a higher protein diet prior to administration of a carcinogen resulted in a reduction of tumor prevalence <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B43">43</abbr>
</abbrgrp>, suggesting a protective effect of protein during the initiation phase. Additionally, increased dietary protein fed after tumor induction had no independent effect on the promotion phase of carcinogenesis <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B44">44</abbr>
</abbrgrp>. In contrast to the findings of the present study, Hawrylewicz et al. found higher dietary protein (33% vs. 15%) increased the number of tumors and tumor weight in MNU-induced rats, despite no difference in tumor incidence or latency <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B45">45</abbr>
</abbrgrp>. However, this study differed substantially from the current study in that the rats were exposed in utero from dams fed the test diets and then consumed the same test diets <it>ad libitum </it>after weaning.</p>
<p>A further consideration is that elevated dietary protein was accomplished at the expense of dietary carbohydrate, and since tumors are obligate glucose consumers, HPMC may have been less energetically favorable to neoplastic tissues. Similarly, a ketogenic diet (80% medium chain triglycerides) fed to mice with implanted colon adenocarcinomas reduced tumor weight, while the inclusion of hydroxybutyrate in drinking water counteracted the stimulation of tumor growth by insulin infusion <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B46">46</abbr>
</abbrgrp>. However, fasted glucose was not different between groups at either 3 or 10 wks, and in reflecting current dietary guidelines, the HPMC diet was not low enough in carbohydrate to induce ketogenesis.</p>
<p>A limitation of the current study is its relatively short length. At 10 wks, tumor incidence had only reached 40% in the HPMC group. Due to the labor-intensive nature of the meal-feeding protocol, this study was designed for 10 wk, with a goal of both groups exceeding 50% tumor incidence. However, within the short period of time, the study still achieved divergent rates of tumor appearance between diet groups.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<st>
<p>Conclusion</p>
</st>
<p>In total, the present study provides evidence that reducing the dietary carbohydrate:protein ratio attenuates the progression of mammary tumors, and this finding is consistent with reduced post-prandial insulin release potentially diminishing the proliferative environment required for breast cancer tumors to progress. These results warrant additional investigation into the potentially protective effect that elevated dietary protein and reduced carbohydrate may have on breast cancer development.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<st>
<p>Competing interests</p>
</st>
<p>The authors declare that they have no competing interests.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<st>
<p>Authors' contributions</p>
</st>
<p>CM participated in the design of the study, coordinated the study, performed the statistical analysis, and drafted the manuscript. RV assisted in performing the study and helped to draft the manuscript. DL conceived of the study, participated in its design, and helped to draft the manuscript. SD helped in conception of the study and its design. KS helped in the conception of the study and its design. MW performed the histochemical analysis. SMD helped to draft the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.</p>
</sec>
</bdy><bm>
<ack>
<sec>
<st>
<p>Acknowledgements</p>
</st>
<p>This work was supported by a grant from the Illinois Council on Food and Agricultural Research. The authors would like to acknowledge the assistance of Dr. Marcia Siegel with the IGF-I RIA.</p>
</sec>
</ack>
<refgrp><bibl id="B1"><title><p>Cancer statistics, 2009</p></title><aug><au><snm>Jemal</snm><fnm>A</fnm></au><au><snm>Siegel</snm><fnm>R</fnm></au><au><snm>Ward</snm><fnm>E</fnm></au><au><snm>Hao</snm><fnm>Y</fnm></au><au><snm>Xu</snm><fnm>J</fnm></au><au><snm>Thun</snm><fnm>MJ</fnm></au></aug><source>CA Cancer J Clin</source><pubdate>2009</pubdate><volume>59</volume><fpage>225</fpage><lpage>49</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.3322/caac.20006</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">19474385</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B2"><title><p>Persistence of restrictions in quality of life from the first to the third year after diagnosis in women with breast cancer</p></title><aug><au><snm>Arndt</snm><fnm>V</fnm></au><au><snm>Merx</snm><fnm>H</fnm></au><au><snm>Stegmaier</snm><fnm>C</fnm></au><au><snm>Ziegler</snm><fnm>H</fnm></au><au><snm>Brenner</snm><fnm>H</fnm></au></aug><source>J Clin Oncol</source><pubdate>2005</pubdate><volume>23</volume><fpage>4945</fpage><lpage>53</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1200/JCO.2005.03.475</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">16051947</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B3"><title><p>Translating science into improved health</p></title><aug><au><snm>Cannon</snm><fnm>G</fnm></au></aug><source>Forum Nutr</source><pubdate>2003</pubdate><volume>56</volume><fpage>186</fpage><lpage>7</lpage><xrefbib><pubid idtype="pmpid">15806855</pubid></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B4"><title><p>Consumption of meat, animal products, protein, and fat and risk of breast cancer: A prospective cohort study in new york</p></title><aug><au><snm>Toniolo</snm><fnm>P</fnm></au><au><snm>Riboli</snm><fnm>E</fnm></au><au><snm>Shore</snm><fnm>RE</fnm></au><au><snm>Pasternack</snm><fnm>BS</fnm></au></aug><source>Epidemiology</source><pubdate>1994</pubdate><volume>5</volume><fpage>391</fpage><lpage>7</lpage><xrefbib><pubid idtype="pmpid">7918807</pubid></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B5"><title><p>Mortality trends and past and current dietary factors of breast cancer in spain</p></title><aug><au><snm>Prieto-Ramos</snm><fnm>F</fnm></au><au><snm>Serra-Majem</snm><fnm>L</fnm></au><au><snm>La Vecchia</snm><fnm>C</fnm></au><au><snm>Ramon</snm><fnm>JM</fnm></au><au><snm>Tresserras</snm><fnm>R</fnm></au><au><snm>Salleras</snm><fnm>L</fnm></au></aug><source>Eur J Epidemiol</source><pubdate>1996</pubdate><volume>12</volume><fpage>141</fpage><lpage>8</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1007/BF00145499</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid">8817192</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B6"><title><p>Meat, eggs, dairy products, and risk of breast cancer in the european prospective investigation into cancer and nutrition (EPIC) cohort</p></title><aug><au><snm>Pala</snm><fnm>V</fnm></au><au><snm>Krogh</snm><fnm>V</fnm></au><au><snm>Berrino</snm><fnm>F</fnm></au><au><snm>Sieri</snm><fnm>S</fnm></au><au><snm>Grioni</snm><fnm>S</fnm></au><au><snm>Tjonneland</snm><fnm>A</fnm></au><au><snm>Olsen</snm><fnm>A</fnm></au><au><snm>Jakobsen</snm><fnm>MU</fnm></au><au><snm>Overvad</snm><fnm>K</fnm></au><etal/></aug><source>Am J Clin Nutr</source><pubdate>2009</pubdate><volume>90</volume><fpage>602</fpage><lpage>12</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.3945/ajcn.2008.27173</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">19491385</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B7"><title><p>Diet and breast cancer: Evidence that extremes in diet are associated with poor survival</p></title><aug><au><snm>Goodwin</snm><fnm>PJ</fnm></au><au><snm>Ennis</snm><fnm>M</fnm></au><au><snm>Pritchard</snm><fnm>KI</fnm></au><au><snm>Koo</snm><fnm>J</fnm></au><au><snm>Trudeau</snm><fnm>ME</fnm></au><au><snm>Hood</snm><fnm>N</fnm></au></aug><source>J Clin Oncol</source><pubdate>2003</pubdate><volume>21</volume><fpage>2500</fpage><lpage>7</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1200/JCO.2003.06.121</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">12829669</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B8"><title><p>Dietary factors and the survival of women with breast carcinoma</p></title><aug><au><snm>Holmes</snm><fnm>MD</fnm></au><au><snm>Stampfer</snm><fnm>MJ</fnm></au><au><snm>Colditz</snm><fnm>GA</fnm></au><au><snm>Rosner</snm><fnm>B</fnm></au><au><snm>Hunter</snm><fnm>DJ</fnm></au><au><snm>Willett</snm><fnm>WC</fnm></au></aug><source>Cancer</source><pubdate>1999</pubdate><volume>86</volume><fpage>826</fpage><lpage>35</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(19990901)86:5&lt;826::AID-CNCR19&gt;3.0.CO;2-0</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">10463982</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B9"><title><p>Nutrient dietary patterns and the risk of breast and ovarian cancers</p></title><aug><au><snm>Edefonti</snm><fnm>V</fnm></au><au><snm>Decarli</snm><fnm>A</fnm></au><au><snm>La Vecchia</snm><fnm>C</fnm></au><au><snm>Bosetti</snm><fnm>C</fnm></au><au><snm>Randi</snm><fnm>G</fnm></au><au><snm>Franceschi</snm><fnm>S</fnm></au><au><snm>Dal Maso</snm><fnm>L</fnm></au><au><snm>Ferraroni</snm><fnm>M</fnm></au></aug><source>Int J Cancer</source><pubdate>2008</pubdate><volume>122</volume><fpage>609</fpage><lpage>13</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1002/ijc.23064</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">17764109</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B10"><title><p>Upper abdominal obesity, insulin resistance and breast cancer risk</p></title><aug><au><snm>Stoll</snm><fnm>BA</fnm></au></aug><source>Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord</source><pubdate>2002</pubdate><volume>26</volume><fpage>747</fpage><lpage>53</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1038/sj.ijo.0801998</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">12037643</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B11"><title><p>Metabolic syndrome, hyperinsulinemia, and colon cancer: A review</p></title><aug><au><snm>Giovannucci</snm><fnm>E</fnm></au></aug><source>Am J Clin Nutr</source><pubdate>2007</pubdate><volume>86</volume><fpage>s836</fpage><lpage>42</lpage><xrefbib><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">18265477</pubid></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B12"><title><p>Banting lecture 1988. role of insulin resistance in human disease</p></title><aug><au><snm>Reaven</snm><fnm>GM</fnm></au></aug><source>Diabetes</source><pubdate>1988</pubdate><volume>37</volume><fpage>1595</fpage><lpage>607</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.2337/diabetes.37.12.1595</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid">3056758</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B13"><title><p>Insulin, macronutrient intake, and physical activity: Are potential indicators of insulin resistance associated with mortality from breast cancer?</p></title><aug><au><snm>Borugian</snm><fnm>MJ</fnm></au><au><snm>Sheps</snm><fnm>SB</fnm></au><au><snm>Kim-Sing</snm><fnm>C</fnm></au><au><snm>Van Patten</snm><fnm>C</fnm></au><au><snm>Potter</snm><fnm>JD</fnm></au><au><snm>Dunn</snm><fnm>B</fnm></au><au><snm>Gallagher</snm><fnm>RP</fnm></au><au><snm>Hislop</snm><fnm>TG</fnm></au></aug><source>Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev</source><pubdate>2004</pubdate><volume>13</volume><fpage>1163</fpage><lpage>72</lpage><xrefbib><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">15247127</pubid></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B14"><title><p>Autocrine signalling through erbB receptors promotes constitutive activation of protein kinase B/Akt in breast cancer cell lines</p></title><aug><au><snm>Nicholson</snm><fnm>KM</fnm></au><au><snm>Streuli</snm><fnm>CH</fnm></au><au><snm>Anderson</snm><fnm>NG</fnm></au></aug><source>Breast Cancer Res Treat</source><pubdate>2003</pubdate><volume>81</volume><fpage>117</fpage><lpage>28</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1023/A:1025765215765</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">14572154</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B15"><title><p>The insulin-related ovarian regulatory system in health and disease</p></title><aug><au><snm>Poretsky</snm><fnm>L</fnm></au><au><snm>Cataldo</snm><fnm>NA</fnm></au><au><snm>Rosenwaks</snm><fnm>Z</fnm></au><au><snm>Giudice</snm><fnm>LC</fnm></au></aug><source>Endocr Rev</source><pubdate>1999</pubdate><volume>20</volume><fpage>535</fpage><lpage>82</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1210/er.20.4.535</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">10453357</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B16"><title><p>Endogenous steroid hormone concentrations and risk of breast cancer among premenopausal women</p></title><aug><au><snm>Eliassen</snm><fnm>AH</fnm></au><au><snm>Missmer</snm><fnm>SA</fnm></au><au><snm>Tworoger</snm><fnm>SS</fnm></au><au><snm>Spiegelman</snm><fnm>D</fnm></au><au><snm>Barbieri</snm><fnm>RL</fnm></au><au><snm>Dowsett</snm><fnm>M</fnm></au><au><snm>Hankinson</snm><fnm>SE</fnm></au></aug><source>J Natl Cancer Inst</source><pubdate>2006</pubdate><volume>98</volume><fpage>1406</fpage><lpage>15</lpage><xrefbib><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">17018787</pubid></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B17"><title><p>A reduced carbohydrate, increased protein diet stabilizes glycemic control and minimizes adipose tissue glucose disposal in rats</p></title><aug><au><snm>Baum</snm><fnm>JI</fnm></au><au><snm>Layman</snm><fnm>DK</fnm></au><au><snm>Freund</snm><fnm>GG</fnm></au><au><snm>Rahn</snm><fnm>KA</fnm></au><au><snm>Nakamura</snm><fnm>MT</fnm></au><au><snm>Yudell</snm><fnm>BE</fnm></au></aug><source>J Nutr</source><pubdate>2006</pubdate><volume>136</volume><fpage>1855</fpage><lpage>61</lpage><xrefbib><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">16772449</pubid></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B18"><title><p>The leucine content of a complete meal directs peak activation but not duration of skeletal muscle protein synthesis and mammalian target of rapamycin signaling in rats</p></title><aug><au><snm>Norton</snm><fnm>LE</fnm></au><au><snm>Layman</snm><fnm>DK</fnm></au><au><snm>Bunpo</snm><fnm>P</fnm></au><au><snm>Anthony</snm><fnm>TG</fnm></au><au><snm>Brana</snm><fnm>DV</fnm></au><au><snm>Garlick</snm><fnm>PJ</fnm></au></aug><source>J Nutr</source><pubdate>2009</pubdate><volume>139</volume><fpage>1103</fpage><lpage>9</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.3945/jn.108.103853</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">19403715</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B19"><title><p>AIN-93 purified diets for laboratory rodents: Final report of the american institute of nutrition ad hoc writing committee on the reformulation of the AIN-76A rodent diet</p></title><aug><au><snm>Reeves</snm><fnm>PG</fnm></au><au><snm>Nielsen</snm><fnm>FH</fnm></au><au><snm>Fahey</snm><fnm>GC</fnm><suf>Jr</suf></au></aug><source>J Nutr</source><pubdate>1993</pubdate><volume>123</volume><fpage>1939</fpage><lpage>51</lpage><xrefbib><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">8229312</pubid></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B20"><title><p>Rapid induction of mammary intraductal proliferations, ductal carcinoma in situ and carcinomas by the injection of sexually immature female rats with 1-methyl-1-nitrosourea</p></title><aug><au><snm>Thompson</snm><fnm>HJ</fnm></au><au><snm>McGinley</snm><fnm>JN</fnm></au><au><snm>Rothhammer</snm><fnm>K</fnm></au><au><snm>Singh</snm><fnm>M</fnm></au></aug><source>Carcinogenesis</source><pubdate>1995</pubdate><volume>16</volume><fpage>2407</fpage><lpage>11</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1093/carcin/16.10.2407</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">7586143</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B21"><title><p>Mammary specific transgenic over-expression of insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I) increases pig milk IGF-I and IGF binding proteins, with no effect on milk composition or yield</p></title><aug><au><snm>Monaco</snm><fnm>MH</fnm></au><au><snm>Gronlund</snm><fnm>DE</fnm></au><au><snm>Bleck</snm><fnm>GT</fnm></au><au><snm>Hurley</snm><fnm>WL</fnm></au><au><snm>Wheeler</snm><fnm>MB</fnm></au><au><snm>Donovan</snm><fnm>SM</fnm></au></aug><source>Transgenic Res</source><pubdate>2005</pubdate><volume>14</volume><fpage>761</fpage><lpage>73</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1007/s11248-005-7219-8</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">16245167</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B22"><title><p>Insulin resistance and breast-cancer risk</p></title><aug><au><snm>Bruning</snm><fnm>PF</fnm></au><au><snm>Bonfrer</snm><fnm>JM</fnm></au><au><snm>van Noord</snm><fnm>PA</fnm></au><au><snm>Hart</snm><fnm>AA</fnm></au><au><snm>de Jong-Bakker</snm><fnm>M</fnm></au><au><snm>Nooijen</snm><fnm>WJ</fnm></au></aug><source>Int J Cancer</source><pubdate>1992</pubdate><volume>52</volume><fpage>511</fpage><lpage>6</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1002/ijc.2910520402</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid">1399128</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B23"><title><p>Fasting insulin and outcome in early-stage breast cancer: Results of a prospective cohort study</p></title><aug><au><snm>Goodwin</snm><fnm>PJ</fnm></au><au><snm>Ennis</snm><fnm>M</fnm></au><au><snm>Pritchard</snm><fnm>KI</fnm></au><au><snm>Trudeau</snm><fnm>ME</fnm></au><au><snm>Koo</snm><fnm>J</fnm></au><au><snm>Madarnas</snm><fnm>Y</fnm></au><au><snm>Hartwick</snm><fnm>W</fnm></au><au><snm>Hoffman</snm><fnm>B</fnm></au><au><snm>Hood</snm><fnm>N</fnm></au></aug><source>J Clin Oncol</source><pubdate>2002</pubdate><volume>20</volume><fpage>42</fpage><lpage>51</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1200/JCO.20.1.42</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">11773152</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B24"><title><p>Repeated measures of serum glucose and insulin in relation to postmenopausal breast cancer</p></title><aug><au><snm>Kabat</snm><fnm>GC</fnm></au><au><snm>Kim</snm><fnm>M</fnm></au><au><snm>Caan</snm><fnm>BJ</fnm></au><au><snm>Chlebowski</snm><fnm>RT</fnm></au><au><snm>Gunter</snm><fnm>MJ</fnm></au><au><snm>Ho</snm><fnm>GY</fnm></au><au><snm>Rodriguez</snm><fnm>BL</fnm></au><au><snm>Shikany</snm><fnm>JM</fnm></au><au><snm>Strickler</snm><fnm>HD</fnm></au><au><snm>Vitolins</snm><fnm>MZ</fnm></au><au><snm>Rohan</snm><fnm>TE</fnm></au></aug><source>Int J Cancer</source><pubdate>2009</pubdate><volume>125</volume><fpage>2704</fpage><lpage>10</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1002/ijc.24609</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">19588485</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B25"><title><p>Meat intake and meat preparation in relation to risk of postmenopausal breast cancer in the NIH-AARP diet and health study</p></title><aug><au><snm>Kabat</snm><fnm>GC</fnm></au><au><snm>Cross</snm><fnm>AJ</fnm></au><au><snm>Park</snm><fnm>Y</fnm></au><au><snm>Schatzkin</snm><fnm>A</fnm></au><au><snm>Hollenbeck</snm><fnm>AR</fnm></au><au><snm>Rohan</snm><fnm>TE</fnm></au><au><snm>Sinha</snm><fnm>R</fnm></au></aug><source>Int J Cancer</source><pubdate>2009</pubdate><volume>124</volume><fpage>2430</fpage><lpage>5</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1002/ijc.24203</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">19165862</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B26"><title><p>Metabolic syndrome and postmenopausal breast cancer in the ORDET cohort: A nested case-control study</p></title><aug><au><snm>Agnoli</snm><fnm>C</fnm></au><au><snm>Berrino</snm><fnm>F</fnm></au><au><snm>Abagnato</snm><fnm>CA</fnm></au><au><snm>Muti</snm><fnm>P</fnm></au><au><snm>Panico</snm><fnm>S</fnm></au><au><snm>Crosignani</snm><fnm>P</fnm></au><au><snm>Krogh</snm><fnm>V</fnm></au></aug><source>Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis</source><pubdate>2009</pubdate><inpress/><xrefbib><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">19361966</pubid></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B27"><title><p>Insulin resistance as the underlying cause for the metabolic syndrome</p></title><aug><au><snm>Lann</snm><fnm>D</fnm></au><au><snm>LeRoith</snm><fnm>D</fnm></au></aug><source>Med Clin North Am</source><pubdate>2007</pubdate><volume>91</volume><note>1063,77, viii</note><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1016/j.mcna.2007.06.012</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">17964909</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B28"><title><p>Metabolic syndrome as a prognostic factor for breast cancer recurrences</p></title><aug><au><snm>Pasanisi</snm><fnm>P</fnm></au><au><snm>Berrino</snm><fnm>F</fnm></au><au><snm>De Petris</snm><fnm>M</fnm></au><au><snm>Venturelli</snm><fnm>E</fnm></au><au><snm>Mastroianni</snm><fnm>A</fnm></au><au><snm>Panico</snm><fnm>S</fnm></au></aug><source>Int J Cancer</source><pubdate>2006</pubdate><volume>119</volume><fpage>236</fpage><lpage>8</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1002/ijc.21812</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">16450399</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B29"><title><p>Dietary glycemic index and glycemic load, and breast cancer risk: A case-control study</p></title><aug><au><snm>Augustin</snm><fnm>LS</fnm></au><au><snm>Dal Maso</snm><fnm>L</fnm></au><au><snm>La Vecchia</snm><fnm>C</fnm></au><au><snm>Parpinel</snm><fnm>M</fnm></au><au><snm>Negri</snm><fnm>E</fnm></au><au><snm>Vaccarella</snm><fnm>S</fnm></au><au><snm>Kendall</snm><fnm>CW</fnm></au><au><snm>Jenkins</snm><fnm>DJ</fnm></au><au><snm>Francesch</snm><fnm>S</fnm></au></aug><source>Ann Oncol</source><pubdate>2001</pubdate><volume>12</volume><fpage>1533</fpage><lpage>8</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1023/A:1013176129380</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">11822751</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B30"><title><p>Dietary glycemic index, glycemic load, and the risk of breast cancer in an italian prospective cohort study</p></title><aug><au><snm>Sieri</snm><fnm>S</fnm></au><au><snm>Pala</snm><fnm>V</fnm></au><au><snm>Brighenti</snm><fnm>F</fnm></au><au><snm>Pellegrini</snm><fnm>N</fnm></au><au><snm>Muti</snm><fnm>P</fnm></au><au><snm>Micheli</snm><fnm>A</fnm></au><au><snm>Evangelista</snm><fnm>A</fnm></au><au><snm>Grioni</snm><fnm>S</fnm></au><au><snm>Contiero</snm><fnm>P</fnm></au><au><snm>Berrino</snm><fnm>F</fnm></au><au><snm>Krogh</snm><fnm>V</fnm></au></aug><source>Am J Clin Nutr</source><pubdate>2007</pubdate><volume>86</volume><fpage>1160</fpage><lpage>6</lpage><xrefbib><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">17921397</pubid></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B31"><title><p>Dietary carbohydrates, fiber, and breast cancer risk in chinese women</p></title><aug><au><snm>Wen</snm><fnm>W</fnm></au><au><snm>Shu</snm><fnm>XO</fnm></au><au><snm>Li</snm><fnm>H</fnm></au><au><snm>Yang</snm><fnm>G</fnm></au><au><snm>Ji</snm><fnm>BT</fnm></au><au><snm>Cai</snm><fnm>H</fnm></au><au><snm>Gao</snm><fnm>YT</fnm></au><au><snm>Zheng</snm><fnm>W</fnm></au></aug><source>Am J Clin Nutr</source><pubdate>2009</pubdate><volume>89</volume><fpage>283</fpage><lpage>9</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.3945/ajcn.2008.26356</pubid><pubid idtype="pmcid">2630482</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid">19056583</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B32"><title><p>Effect of insulin on the hepatic production of insulin-like growth factor-binding protein-1 (IGFBP-1), IGFBP-3, and IGF-I in insulin-dependent diabetes</p></title><aug><au><snm>Brismar</snm><fnm>K</fnm></au><au><snm>Fernqvist-Forbes</snm><fnm>E</fnm></au><au><snm>Wahren</snm><fnm>J</fnm></au><au><snm>Hall</snm><fnm>K</fnm></au></aug><source>J Clin Endocrinol Metab</source><pubdate>1994</pubdate><volume>79</volume><fpage>872</fpage><lpage>8</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1210/jc.79.3.872</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">7521354</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B33"><title><p>Paracrine overexpression of insulin-like growth factor-1 enhances mammary tumorigenesis in vivo</p></title><aug><au><snm>de Ostrovich</snm><fnm>KK</fnm></au><au><snm>Lambertz</snm><fnm>I</fnm></au><au><snm>Colby</snm><fnm>JK</fnm></au><au><snm>Tian</snm><fnm>J</fnm></au><au><snm>Rundhaug</snm><fnm>JE</fnm></au><au><snm>Johnston</snm><fnm>D</fnm></au><au><snm>Conti</snm><fnm>CJ</fnm></au><au><snm>DiGiovanni</snm><fnm>J</fnm></au><au><snm>Fuchs-Young</snm><fnm>R</fnm></au></aug><source>Am J Pathol</source><pubdate>2008</pubdate><volume>173</volume><fpage>824</fpage><lpage>34</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.2353/ajpath.2008.071005</pubid><pubid idtype="pmcid">2527085</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid">18688034</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B34"><title><p>Reduced circulating insulin-like growth factor I levels delay the onset of chemically and genetically induced mammary tumors</p></title><aug><au><snm>Wu</snm><fnm>Y</fnm></au><au><snm>Cui</snm><fnm>K</fnm></au><au><snm>Miyoshi</snm><fnm>K</fnm></au><au><snm>Hennighausen</snm><fnm>L</fnm></au><au><snm>Green</snm><fnm>JE</fnm></au><au><snm>Setser</snm><fnm>J</fnm></au><au><snm>LeRoith</snm><fnm>D</fnm></au><au><snm>Yakar</snm><fnm>S</fnm></au></aug><source>Cancer Res</source><pubdate>2003</pubdate><volume>63</volume><fpage>4384</fpage><lpage>8</lpage><xrefbib><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">12907608</pubid></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B35"><title><p>The role of endocrine insulin-like growth factor-I and insulin in breast cancer</p></title><aug><au><snm>Lann</snm><fnm>D</fnm></au><au><snm>LeRoith</snm><fnm>D</fnm></au></aug><source>J Mammary Gland Biol Neoplasia</source><pubdate>2008</pubdate><volume>13</volume><fpage>371</fpage><lpage>9</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1007/s10911-008-9100-x</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">19030972</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B36"><title><p>Insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I), IGF-binding proteins, and breast cancer</p></title><aug><au><snm>Krajcik</snm><fnm>RA</fnm></au><au><snm>Borofsky</snm><fnm>ND</fnm></au><au><snm>Massardo</snm><fnm>S</fnm></au><au><snm>Orentreich</snm><fnm>N</fnm></au></aug><source>Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev</source><pubdate>2002</pubdate><volume>11</volume><fpage>1566</fpage><lpage>73</lpage><xrefbib><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">12496045</pubid></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B37"><title><p>Nested case-control study of the association of circulating levels of serum insulin-like growth factor I and insulin-like growth factor binding protein 3 with breast cancer in young women in norway</p></title><aug><au><snm>Vatten</snm><fnm>LJ</fnm></au><au><snm>Holly</snm><fnm>JM</fnm></au><au><snm>Gunnell</snm><fnm>D</fnm></au><au><snm>Tretli</snm><fnm>S</fnm></au></aug><source>Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev</source><pubdate>2008</pubdate><volume>17</volume><fpage>2097</fpage><lpage>100</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-08-0212</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">18708402</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B38"><title><p>Insulin, insulin-like growth factor-I, and risk of breast cancer in postmenopausal women</p></title><aug><au><snm>Gunter</snm><fnm>MJ</fnm></au><au><snm>Hoover</snm><fnm>DR</fnm></au><au><snm>Yu</snm><fnm>H</fnm></au><au><snm>Wassertheil-Smoller</snm><fnm>S</fnm></au><au><snm>Rohan</snm><fnm>TE</fnm></au><au><snm>Manson</snm><fnm>JE</fnm></au><au><snm>Li</snm><fnm>J</fnm></au><au><snm>Ho</snm><fnm>GY</fnm></au><au><snm>Xue</snm><fnm>X</fnm></au><au><snm>Anderson</snm><fnm>GL</fnm></au><au><snm>Kaplan</snm><fnm>RC</fnm></au><au><snm>Harris</snm><fnm>TG</fnm></au><au><snm>Howard</snm><fnm>BV</fnm></au><au><snm>Wylie-Rosett</snm><fnm>J</fnm></au><au><snm>Burk</snm><fnm>RD</fnm></au><au><snm>Strickler</snm><fnm>HD</fnm></au></aug><source>J Natl Cancer Inst</source><pubdate>2009</pubdate><volume>101</volume><fpage>48</fpage><lpage>60</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="pmcid">2639294</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid">19116382</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B39"><title><p>Insulin-like growth factors and their binding proteins: Biological actions</p></title><aug><au><snm>Jones</snm><fnm>JI</fnm></au><au><snm>Clemmons</snm><fnm>DR</fnm></au></aug><source>Endocr Rev</source><pubdate>1995</pubdate><volume>16</volume><fpage>3</fpage><lpage>34</lpage><xrefbib><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">7758431</pubid></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B40"><title><p>Changes in serum concentrations of growth hormone, insulin, insulin-like growth factor and insulin-like growth factor-binding proteins 1 and 3 and urinary growth hormone excretion during the menstrual cycle</p></title><aug><au><snm>Juul</snm><fnm>A</fnm></au><au><snm>Scheike</snm><fnm>T</fnm></au><au><snm>Pedersen</snm><fnm>AT</fnm></au><au><snm>Main</snm><fnm>KM</fnm></au><au><snm>Andersson</snm><fnm>AM</fnm></au><au><snm>Pedersen</snm><fnm>LM</fnm></au><au><snm>Skakkebaek</snm><fnm>NE</fnm></au></aug><source>Hum Reprod</source><pubdate>1997</pubdate><volume>12</volume><fpage>2123</fpage><lpage>8</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1093/humrep/12.10.2123</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">9402266</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B41"><title><p>Interactions between insulin, body fat, and insulin-like growth factor axis proteins</p></title><aug><au><snm>Ahmed</snm><fnm>RL</fnm></au><au><snm>Thomas</snm><fnm>W</fnm></au><au><snm>Schmitz</snm><fnm>KH</fnm></au></aug><source>Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev</source><pubdate>2007</pubdate><volume>16</volume><fpage>593</fpage><lpage>7</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-06-0775</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">17372257</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B42"><title><p>Diet, serum insulin-like growth factor-I and IGF-binding protein-3 in european women</p></title><aug><au><snm>Norat</snm><fnm>T</fnm></au><au><snm>Dossus</snm><fnm>L</fnm></au><au><snm>Rinaldi</snm><fnm>S</fnm></au><au><snm>Overvad</snm><fnm>K</fnm></au><au><snm>Gronbaek</snm><fnm>H</fnm></au><au><snm>Tjonneland</snm><fnm>A</fnm></au><au><snm>Olsen</snm><fnm>A</fnm></au><au><snm>Clavel-Chapelon</snm><fnm>F</fnm></au><au><snm>Boutron-Ruault</snm><fnm>MC</fnm></au><au><snm>Boeing</snm><fnm>H</fnm></au><au><snm>Lahmann</snm><fnm>PH</fnm></au><au><snm>Linseisen</snm><fnm>J</fnm></au><au><snm>Nagel</snm><fnm>G</fnm></au><au><snm>Trichopoulou</snm><fnm>A</fnm></au><au><snm>Trichopoulos</snm><fnm>D</fnm></au><au><snm>Kalapothaki</snm><fnm>V</fnm></au><au><snm>Sieri</snm><fnm>S</fnm></au><au><snm>Palli</snm><fnm>D</fnm></au><au><snm>Panico</snm><fnm>S</fnm></au><au><snm>Tumino</snm><fnm>R</fnm></au><au><snm>Sacerdote</snm><fnm>C</fnm></au><au><snm>Bueno-de-Mesquita</snm><fnm>HB</fnm></au><au><snm>Peeters</snm><fnm>PH</fnm></au><au><snm>van Gils</snm><fnm>CH</fnm></au><au><snm>Agudo</snm><fnm>A</fnm></au><au><snm>Amiano</snm><fnm>P</fnm></au><au><snm>Ardanoz</snm><fnm>E</fnm></au><au><snm>Martinez</snm><fnm>C</fnm></au><au><snm>Quir&#243;s</snm><fnm>R</fnm></au><au><snm>Tormo</snm><fnm>MJ</fnm></au><etal/></aug><source>Eur J Clin Nutr</source><pubdate>2007</pubdate><volume>61</volume><fpage>91</fpage><lpage>8</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1038/sj.ejcn.1602494</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">16900085</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B43"><title><p>Effects of dietary protein, fat and energy intake during an initiation phase study of 7,12-dimethylbenz[a]anthracene-induced breast cancer in rats</p></title><aug><au><snm>Clinton</snm><fnm>SK</fnm></au><au><snm>Alster</snm><fnm>JM</fnm></au><au><snm>Imrey</snm><fnm>PB</fnm></au><au><snm>Nandkumar</snm><fnm>S</fnm></au><au><snm>Truex</snm><fnm>CR</fnm></au><au><snm>Visek</snm><fnm>WJ</fnm></au></aug><source>J Nutr</source><pubdate>1986</pubdate><volume>116</volume><fpage>2290</fpage><lpage>302</lpage><xrefbib><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">3098937</pubid></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B44"><title><p>The combined effects of dietary protein and fat intake during the promotion phase of 7,12-dimethylbenz(a)anthracene-induced breast cancer in rats</p></title><aug><au><snm>Clinton</snm><fnm>SK</fnm></au><au><snm>Alster</snm><fnm>JM</fnm></au><au><snm>Imrey</snm><fnm>PB</fnm></au><au><snm>Simon</snm><fnm>J</fnm></au><au><snm>Visek</snm><fnm>WJ</fnm></au></aug><source>J Nutr</source><pubdate>1988</pubdate><volume>118</volume><fpage>1577</fpage><lpage>85</lpage><xrefbib><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">3145333</pubid></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B45"><title><p>Dietary protein, enhancement of N-nitrosomethylurea-induced mammary carcinogenesis, and their effect on hormone regulation in rats</p></title><aug><au><snm>Hawrylewicz</snm><fnm>EJ</fnm></au><au><snm>Huang</snm><fnm>HH</fnm></au><au><snm>Liu</snm><fnm>JM</fnm></au></aug><source>Cancer Res</source><pubdate>1986</pubdate><volume>46</volume><fpage>4395</fpage><lpage>9</lpage><xrefbib><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">3731097</pubid></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B46"><title><p>Effect of insulin on weight loss and tumour growth in a cachexia model</p></title><aug><au><snm>Beck</snm><fnm>SA</fnm></au><au><snm>Tisdale</snm><fnm>MJ</fnm></au></aug><source>Br J Cancer</source><pubdate>1989</pubdate><volume>59</volume><issue>5</issue><fpage>677</fpage><lpage>81</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="pmcid">2247211</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid">2736199</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl></refgrp>
</bm></art>
