Open Access Highly Accessed Brief communication

Daytime pattern of post-exercise protein intake affects whole-body protein turnover in resistance-trained males

Daniel R Moore12*, Jose Areta3, Vernon G Coffey3, Trent Stellingwerff124, Stuart M Phillips5, Louise M Burke6, Marilyn Cléroux1, Jean-Philippe Godin1 and John A Hawley3

Author Affiliations

1 Nestlé Research Centre, Nestec Ltd, Lausanne, Switzerland

2 Human Health and Nutritional Sciences, University of Guelph, 50 Stone Road East, Guelph, Ontario, N1G 2W1, Canada

3 Exercise and Nutrition Research Group, School of Medical Sciences, RMIT University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia

4 Canadian Sport Centre - Pacific, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada

5 Department of Kinesiology, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada

6 Sports Nutrition, Australian Institute of Sport, Belconnen, ACT, Australia

For all author emails, please log on.

Nutrition & Metabolism 2012, 9:91  doi:10.1186/1743-7075-9-91

Published: 16 October 2012

Abstract

Background

The pattern of protein intake following exercise may impact whole-body protein turnover and net protein retention. We determined the effects of different protein feeding strategies on protein metabolism in resistance-trained young men.

Methods

Participants were randomly assigned to ingest either 80g of whey protein as 8x10g every 1.5h (PULSE; n=8), 4x20g every 3h (intermediate, INT; n=7), or 2x40g every 6h (BOLUS; n=8) after an acute bout of bilateral knee extension exercise (4x10 repetitions at 80% maximal strength). Whole-body protein turnover (Q), synthesis (S), breakdown (B), and net balance (NB) were measured throughout 12h of recovery by a bolus ingestion of [15N]glycine with urinary [15N]ammonia enrichment as the collected end-product.

Results

PULSE Q rates were greater than BOLUS (~19%, P<0.05) with a trend towards being greater than INT (~9%, P=0.08). Rates of S were 32% and 19% greater and rates of B were 51% and 57% greater for PULSE as compared to INT and BOLUS, respectively (P<0.05), with no difference between INT and BOLUS. There were no statistical differences in NB between groups (P=0.23); however, magnitude-based inferential statistics revealed likely small (mean effect±90%CI; 0.59±0.87) and moderate (0.80±0.91) increases in NB for PULSE and INT compared to BOLUS and possible small increase (0.42±1.00) for INT vs. PULSE.

Conclusion

We conclude that the pattern of ingested protein, and not only the total daily amount, can impact whole-body protein metabolism. Individuals aiming to maximize NB would likely benefit from repeated ingestion of moderate amounts of protein (~20g) at regular intervals (~3h) throughout the day.

Keywords:
Protein intake; Protein metabolism; Exercise training; Hypertrophy; Lean body mass