Table 2 |
|||||
|
Performance of lactating dairy cows receiving rumen-protected supplements of conjugated linoleic acid (CLA)1,2 (J Dairy Sci 2004, 87:3010–3016). |
|||||
|
Treatment |
|||||
|
|
|||||
|
Variable |
Control |
AP-CLA |
LE-CLA |
SEM |
P3 |
|
|
|||||
|
DMI, kg/d |
30.6 |
31.6 |
30.4 |
0.9 |
0.50 |
|
Milk, kg/d |
40.5 |
42.6 |
42.7 |
3.5 |
0.32 |
|
Milk fat |
|||||
|
% |
3.23a |
2.37b |
2.34b |
0.15 |
< 0.001 |
|
kg/d |
1.272 |
1.004b |
0.992b |
0.079 |
< 0.001 |
|
Milk protein |
|||||
|
% |
2.55 |
2.51 |
2.58 |
0.12 |
0.07 |
|
kg/d |
1.001b |
1.063a |
1.086 |
0.023 |
0.02 |
|
|
|||||
|
a,bMeans within a row with different superscripts differ. 1Supplements were amide-protected CLA (AP-CLA) and lipid-encapsulated CLA (LE-CLA). 2Values represent an average of day 6 and 7 of supplementation. 3Statistical probability of treatment effects. |
|||||
|
Moon et al. Nutrition & Metabolism 2008 5:16 doi:10.1186/1743-7075-5-16 |
|||||